Code Orange






<< November 2009 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30




Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:


rss feed

Blogdrive


Jun 3, 2004
"Anti-Semitism"

Criticizing Israel's policies is not anti-Semitic [as long as these criticisms are backed up by arguments that are not anti-Semitic], and to call those who point out government mistakes and corruption unpatriotic is itself unpatriotic.
It is not right for Israelis and their apologists to claim that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel for what it does if there is any act of inhumanity in the world which is worse which does not receive equal criticism. Most news coverage of the atrocities Israeli commits against the Palestinians is not anti-Semitic in any way, shape, or form.
What Israel does to the Palestinians and others and the acts committed by many Islamic fundamentalists are terrorism just the same.
The UN has been asked to condemn "anti-Semitism," but has done nothing wrong. All the UN did was criticize was the immoral and illegal war in Iraq.

Posted at 09:49 am by hummerh3
Make a comment

May 21, 2004
Israel 001

Israel had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, but they were not involved as a number of conspiracy theorists (such as Michael Rivero, who many consider to be very anti-Semitic). (If Israel was behind 9/11, why would they surveil their own terrorists? Why would Israel risk being caught by the U.S. as being part of the 9/11 even if they intended to provide the U.S. with an excuse to attack Iraq? They would have almost certainly done better than trying to tie Atta to an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague. Why would Israel give the U.S. any warning if they were hoping to catch the U.S. by surprise? Israel's spying is usually industrial espionage.) It seems more likely that 9/11 was a domestic conspiracy. One possibility is that Israel's role was to provide some "plausible deniability" to the U.S. government while conducting some much needed discrete intelligence.
Mossad was not the one who prevented fighter jets from intercepting the planes (Flight 11 and Flight 175). Mossad is not responsible for the incompetent George Bush's utter lack of response that day.

Posted at 08:51 am by hummerh3
Make a comment

Miscellaneous 001

The war in Iraq is immoral, but if you don't want take my word for it, then click here.

Officer Says Army Tried to Curb Red Cross Visits to Prison in Iraq.

A professional video editor in the business for 11 years tears the no-767 theory to shreds. The author of this page also points out that such outrageous conspiracy theories could discredit the 9/11 Truth Movement. This page however provides compelling arguments against the official story regarding the [faked] Pentagon attack and the "collapse" of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7.

It's painfully obvious that Bush's Middle East policies are a complete failure and that they are increasing anti-American sentiment and the likelihood of terrorist attacks.

The U.S. is leaving on June 30? 14 US military bases are being constructed, enough to hold the (for the time being) 110,000 American soldiers who will stay in Iraq until at least 2007!

This article contains information published by The Information Office of China's State Council: the Summary of Human Rights Record of the U.S. in 2002, published by The Information Office of China's State Council. The people who committed the atrocious acts described in the article represent some of the lowest forms of humanity.

NBC and Reuters prisoners were abused by American soldiers in January. NBC and Reuter's knew about it all this time but sat on the story. This page contains the Abu Ghraib abuse photos that have been made public so far. Other far more graphic photos are still being withheld. Frontpage takes on the Vatican for making this absurb suggestion: Abu Ghraib is more damaging to America's image than 9/11.

Why
do they hate us? What an insane question.

Iraq may be Bush's end.

Fake terror is not unique to America. It also takes place in Russia, among other nations.

PayPal has frozen the account of another anti-war website. Is it time to boycott PayPal?

Anti-American sentiment is rising in Asia. Can anyone think of any place where hatred of America is becoming less common?

If America and Israel continue to attack the Middle East, people are going to start thinking that the war is against Islam. article

 A new poll reveals that 63% of Canadians believe that America had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and did nothing.

US fire 'kills 40 Iraqi wedding guests' More information.


Posted at 08:28 am by hummerh3
Make a comment

Nick E. Berg

Just when reports and photos of the systematic American rape, torture, and murder of Iraqis at the Abu Ghraib prison (Bush, Ashcroft, and Rumsfeld had signed off a memo on a secret system of detention and interrogation that opened the door for abuses of prisoners at Abu Ghraib) is surfacing, an execution video appears and gives the citizens of America a reason to think that the Iraqis deserve to be treated so inhumanely. Most Iraqis are just defending themselves, their home, and their family from an illegal and sadistic occupying army. The neocons must be insane if they consider this terrorism.

Questions about the Nick Berg story

1. Why would an increasingly pious Jew tote anti-Semitic literature, which may have been written in Arabic, a language he couldn't read?
2. Why would Berg go to Iraq without a job or any prospect of work?
3. Are American officials afraid to divulge why they were holding Berg, or are they afraid the fact that they held him proves official American complicity in his death?
4. Why was one of the beheaders wearing a golden ring if such behavior is forbidden by Islam?
5. How can the CIA have concluded that one of the beheaders in the video is Zaqrawi if the beheader was masked? How was the CIA able to identify anyone in the video?
6. How can one of the beheaders be Zaqrawi at all? According to an April 2003 U.S. military report, Zaqrawi was killed in the bombing of Falluja? The American media has claimed that Zaqrawi lost a leg in 2001, but none of the figures in the video appear to be handicapped.
7. Why was the American media so quick to point out that what the terrorists do to Americans is worse than what the Americans do to the Iraqis? The tortures and abuses have gone on for over a year. If al Qaeda wanted to avenge prison abuse, it would have already done it and probably on several occasions. How could al Qaeda engage in this synchronized American media play?
8. Why didn't the victim in the video resist the killing?
9. Why do many viewers of the video insist that the scream came from a woman and that it was amateurishly added on to the tape?
10. Why were some of the beheaders' hands so pale
11. If the beheaders were Feyadeen or mujahadeen, they probably would have been living underground since the first days of the occupation; why are they so fat (by Iraqi standards)?
12. Why was there such a lack of blood after the purported crude, rapid decpitation?
13. Why would a terrorist cell be using a a standard issue military chair of the exact same kind as seen in a color photo taken at the Abu Ghraib Prison?
14. Why were the "insurgents" using not AK-47s as they almost universally do, but anIsraeli-made weapon that improves on the famous AK- 47 (called a Gilal)?

Nick E. Berg - The Perfect Patsy.


Posted at 08:27 am by hummerh3


Neoconservatives

The neocons believe that:

a) America is essentially good, while the terrorists are inherently evil and have no rational reasons to commit terrorism. [Terrorists want to be able to live in peace in countries whose assets are not being stolen by corrupt governments run by puppets of American oil companies, to choose their own leaders, and to be free of a sadistic and illegal occupying force.]

b) the war on terrorism is a comic-book battle between Good (America and our allies) and Evil (Islamic fundamentalism).

c) terrorism can only be stopped through military means.

d) Americans are morally superior to the rest of the world, and that God is behind their actions.

e) Muslims and Arabs are basically inferior and do not deserve democracy.

f) root causes should be ignored and America should exploit and colonize the Middle East.

g) it is okay to invade a country for its opium or oil while making the excuse that it the invasion is to find WMDs or stop terrorism. [The atrocities committed by soldiers and military contractors in Iraq is only increasing anti-American sentiment and the likelihood of terrorist attacks.]

h) Israel should be allowed to terrorize the Palestinian people and steal their land.

i) fear can be used against the people of the world by encouraging terrorist reprisals against the implementation of the American war on terror.

j) terrorists have succeeded in blackmailing a country into agreeing with their terms in terrorism occurs and an electorate votes for a party with a sane, constructive approach towards terrorism that doesn't involve "shock and awe." [First it was Spain, and this November, a terrorist attack will occur in America and if Bush isn't voted for, the terrorists have blackmailed America. This neocon view is total bullcrap.]


Posted at 08:27 am by hummerh3
Make a comment

George Walker Bush - (under construction)

George Walker Bush was not legitimately elected to his post. Bush lost the popular vote by at least 544,683 votes, meaning that the majority of America did not want Bush to be president. 91,000 minority voters, half of whom are black, were purged from the Florida vote by Jeb Bush, which means that Floridaís electoral college vote was invalid. These voters are still purged from the election to this day. Bushís biggest lifetime campaign contributor--Kenneth Lay, former C.E.O. of Enron Corporation--presided over one of the largest corporate bankruptcy frauds in world history. George Walker Bush has a history of crimes. He has at least one conviction for drunk driving in Maine and his Texas driving record has been expunged and is unavailable. J.H. Hatfield, author of Fortunate Son, alleged that Bush was arrested for possession of cocaine in 1972, but Hatfield was later found dead in his apartment. A 38-year-old Texas woman who accused Bush of rape was found ìsuicided.î

Bush became president with a budget surplus of $127 billion, but his 2001 tax cut combined with a weakening economy and the Sept. 11 attacks to eliminate the surplus and create a $157.8 billion deficit.†The current budget deficit is more than $521 billion, for which one can give partial credit to Bushís tax cuts. Bush promised that his tax cuts would create 306,000 new jobs per month, but only 221,000 have been created per month since his tax cuts took effect. Only 1,000 new jobs were created in December 2003, even though analysts had expected a gain of 130,000. As a result of the cut in capital gains and dividends taxes Bush made in 2003, 88% of American citizens will save less than $100 on their 2006 federal taxes. Bush rejected a 2003 Treasury Department study that projected that the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent universal income tax increase would be needed in order to eliminate a projected $44.2 trillion budget deficit due to Bush's tax cuts. Because of Bush's huge tax cuts, we can't afford the cost of hiring 100 new public-school teachers: $3.125 million, the cost of hiring 100 state child-care workers: $2.08 million, the cost of fully immunizing 100 children against preventable diseases: $64,433, 250,000 new fire trucks: $56.2 billion, or afford the funding needs for community-based services in the care and treatment of HIV/AIDS in 2002: $2 billion. Each American citizen's share of the national debt is $24,402.84, and the National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.87 billion per day since September 30, 2003. 1.57 million people filed for bankruptcy in 2002, and 43.6 million Americans were without health insurance that year. In the years of the Bush Administration, over 3.1 million Americans have lost their jobs. There has been a 6% increase since 2001 in the number of U.S. families in poverty.

Bush opened 58 million acres of public lands to road building, logging, and drilling. Bush has attempted to downgrade or weaken 200 public health and environmental laws. For example, Bush weakens a federal program for cleaning up dirty waters, and he strongly opposes mining law reforms that would improve environmental safeguards against widespread resource degradation. Bush asked Congress to eliminate an $8.2 million research program on how to decontaminate buildings attacked by toxins -- the same day a poison-laced letter shuttered Senate offices. Bushís energy plan provides no scientific analysis of why fossil and nuclear fuel supplies must be expanded, doesn't assess the potential for energy efficiency and renewable energy, doesn't include tax incentives for energy-efficient technologies, contains no proposals that would spur utility energy efficiency programs nationally, is designed to ensure the dominance of fossil fuels, and endangers public lands, including Rocky Mountain Front in Montana, Bridger-Teton National Forest in Wyoming, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain in Alaska, Weatherman Draw (Valley of the Chiefs) in Montana, Weatherman Draw listed as an Endangered Sacred Site by Sacred Land Film Project, Wilderness-quality lands in Utah's Book Cliffs, Jack Morrow Hills of Wyoming's Red Desert (a pristine area proposed as a national park since the 1930s), Little Missouri National Grasslands in North Dakota, Otero Mesa in New Mexico, Vermillion Basin in Colorado, Green River Basin in Wyoming, and Valle Vidal/Carson National Forest in New Mexico.

In order to generate support for the war, Bush demonized Saddam Hussein and referred to atrocities he committed almost two decades ago. The U.S. provided financial aid, military intelligence, and actual military planning to Iraq at a time when the Reagan-Bush Sr. administration was well aware that Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iran. The deaths of the Kurds may have been caused by both Iraqi and Iranian weapons, or just Iranian chemical weapons.

None of the alleged hijackers were Iraqis or Afghanis. 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers were Arabs. Eight of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are reportedly alive and the victims of stolen identity. There is no evidence that Iraqís government has ties to radical Muslim terrorists as Bush claimed. Several calls for the invasion of Iraq were made before 9/11 by the Bush Administration and others. For example, the Bush White House held its second National Security Council meeting on February 1, 2001, in which the issue of regime change in Iraq was a central topic. One of the memos discussed during the meeting is titled, ìPlan for post-Saddam Iraq.î According to reports, the memo discussed the need for troops in a post-Saddam occupation, war crimes tribunals, and how to split up Iraq's oil supplies. There is no solid evidence that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction. If Bush is really concerned about the threats posed by ìrogue statesî that possess weapons of mass destruction, the U.S. would also be rattling the sabers at several of its own allies, and even itself. India, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, Israel, Russia, France, and China all have nuclear capability. North Korea will not hesitate to use their WMDs and Israel recently said they could wipe out any European capital at will. North Korea has 5,000 tons of chemical and biological agents, including sarin, anthrax, smallpox, and the plague. Iraq is not considered a threat to any of its neighbors, as most of Iraqís neighbors have sophisticated antiaircraft capability, and Israel has the best regional missile defense system in the world, so a hostile aircraft from Iraq would be aborted. There is no evidence that Iraqís Scud missiles and launchers even survived the Gulf War in operable condition. If Iraq is not a threat to its neighbors, it certainly isnít a threat to the U.S. Iraq has not engaged in terrorism against the West since its failed plot to assassinate former President Bush in 1993 in Kuwait. Bush falsely claimed that Iraq has stores of chemical weapons, and falsely claimed that Iraq has biological weapons. There is no evidence that Iraqís government has ties to radical Muslim terrorists as Bush claimed. The alleged meeting between Mohamed Atta and officials in Prague has been proven false. Bush unilaterally attacked Iraq, a sovereign nation, against the will of the United Nations and the global community. In doing so, he rendered the entire United Nations irrelevant. The U.S. invasion of Iraq violates Article 2 and Articles 39 through 51 of the United Nations Charter. The U.S. invasion of Iraq violates Resolution 687. It also violates Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution passed by Congress in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks. The United Nations removed the U.S. from the human rights commission, and removed the U.S. from the elections monitoring board. Bush refused to allow inspectors access to U.S. prisoners of war and by default no longer abides by the Geneva Conventions, and withdrew from the world court of law. Bush had the U.S. suspend $47 million in military aid to 35 countries after they failed to sign agreements giving Americans immunity from prosecution before the International Criminal Court.

Between 10 and 15 million people worldwide simultaneously took to the streets to protest against the Iraq War. Iraqi opposition groups didnít support the U.S. plans to remove Saddam Hussein. The Kurdish Democratic Party, Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, and the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq have all expressed opposition to U.S. ambitions in Iraq. Most Iraqis did not welcome U.S. soldiers as liberators. They instead believe that the U.S. is interested in occupying Iraq indefinitely.

Bushís policy of regime change has set a dangerous precedent. The implication will be that it is all right for any country to invade its neighbor and remove its leader, if the leaders of the invading country believe that its neighbor poses a threat to it, even if the world community disagrees and even if the invading country has failed to demonstrate the validity of its claims. The Iraq War is causing mass casualties. 32% of the bombs dropped on Iraq are not precision-guided. A minimum of 8,930 and a maximum of 10,781+ Iraqi casualties have been documented. 30% of these Iraqis were noncombatant unarmed civilians. Unnamed U.S. military officials estimate that 10,000-15,000 Iraqis have been killed -- some reports suggest even considerably higher. Bush may be attacking Iraq because Iraq has 112 billion barrels of proven reserves worth about $3.2424 trillion†at current market prices, the Caspian Sea Oil Reserves are valued at $33 billion, and in late 2000, Saddam Hussein switched from dollars to euros for oil currency. Iran is also considering switching. More than 705 U.S. soldiers have died fighting in Iraq. 59 Britons, five Bulgarians, one Dane, one Estonian, 17 Italians, two Poles, one Salvadoran, 11 Spaniards, two Thai, and four Ukrainians have also perished. Bush promised that Iraq would have democracy, but Paul Bremer, the U.S. Administrator, handpicks the new governing body and holds veto power over anything they decide. Bush and his administration delayed release of information about North Korea restarting its nuclear program until after the Senate approved a war powers resolution on Iraq. Bush says he cares about our troops, but he hasnít attended a single funeral for a U.S. soldier and hasnít allowed the coffins of any U.S. soldiers to be photographed.

Bush lied that careful science demonstrates that depleted uranium is no big risk to the population. Depleted uranium can increase cancer rates by as much as 900%. The Gulf War resulted in the deaths of almost 2 million Iraqis and injured thousands of innocent people. Many are still dying as an aftereffect of that battle from the depleted uranium. Many Iraqi babies are either stillborn or grossly deformed. Nearly 100,000 American soldiers are suffering from the debilitating effects of depleted uranium, a.k.a. ìGulf War Syndrome.î In addition, five thousand British servicemen are suffering from the same condition and 11,000 Gulf War veterans are dead. Uranium was also used extensively in the recent war on Afghanistan. Bush claimed that his Niger-Iraq nuclear statement in his State of the Union Speech was because of a miscommunication, but he and his staff made the same statement multiple times before and after his speech in an attempt to cover up lies with more lies. Before the war, 92% of Iraqís urban areas had access to drinking water, compared to less than 60% today. Before the war, 55% of the Iraqi work force was unemployed, although now 80% of the work force is unemployed. The U.S. has yet to restore electricity in Iraq. Though it is true that Iraq is located on one of the largest oil reserves in the world, the country now needs to import oil because of the dilapidated state of its oil production facilities and ongoing sabotage. The Iraq war costs over $111.808 billion so far, which is enough to provide health insurance to 47.924+ million kids for one year, or provide 2.835+ million students 4-year scholarships at public universities.

Bush, in his State of the Union Speech said, ìTo date we have arrested or otherwise dealt with many key commanders of Al Qaeda.î Actually, most of these key commanders are still at large, and the status of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is still in dispute.

Bush said he would make sure the health care system would be funded, but then cut the budget for childrenís hospitals by 15%.

Bush broke his promise to establish the Healthy Communities Innovation Fund to provide $500 million in grants over five years to target specific health risks.

In New Mexico, Bush glorified the efforts of the Even Start program, then decreased federal funding by 20%.

Bush promised to increase funding for first responders, then tried to cut $1 billion of existing grants. Bush later rejected $150 million in state and local grant requests for first responders. In New Jersey, Bush vetoed legislation to increase funding after he spoke about the important security work to be done at shipping ports.

Bush cut funding to 164,000 veterans, and his budget fell $1.5 billion short of the needed amount.

Bush claimed that Kenneth Lay, the C.E.O. of ENRON, supported his opponent in Texas, despite Lay's gift of $37,000 to Bush.

At a South Dakota ethanol plant, Bush claimed support for ethanol as a way to decrease dependence on imported oil, then submitted his budget, which eliminated funding for the same ethanol plant.

Bush said that he highly valued education in New York, but then cut funding for training programs. After vowing to leave no child behind, Bush proposed to cut No Child Left Behind programs by $90 million overall, leaving these programs more than $7 billion short of what was authorized under the bill.

Bush said, in his State of the Union speech, that the U.S. is working with other governments to secure nuclear materials in the former Soviet Union and to strengthen the global treaties banning the production and shipment of missile technologies and weapons of mass destruction. However, Bush actually cut funding for the program.

In his State of the Union Speech, Bush said, ìWe will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents and other generations.î Bushís handling of the economy is creating huge deficits and weakening Social Security, problems that will be passed on to our generation.

Bush deliberately dresses his war rhetoric in language designed to appeal to the Christian Right, the key building block of the conservative arm of the Republican Party. Bush talks about evil and evildoers and repeatedly draws God into an explicit alliance with the Administrationís agenda. Bushís plans open the door to federal regulation of religion. While on the campaign trail, Bush promised that he would ìnot discriminate for or against Methodist or Mormons or Muslims or good people with no faith at all.î Then he announced that he would not allow funding of the Nation of Islam, because he says the group ìpreaches hate.î

This site has more excellent info about Bush's utter incompetence as president.

Posted at 08:27 am by hummerh3
Make a comment

A chronology of commercial airline hijackings

Specifics, details about each flight will be added later: 1958 * February 6 - British European Flight 609 (Munich air disaster) 1972 * January 26 - JAT Yugoslav Flight 364 * June 18 - British European Flight 848 (Staines air disaster) * June 24 - Prinair Flight 191 1974 * March 3 - Turkish Airlines Flight 981 (Ermenonville air disaster) 1978 * September 25 - PSA Flight 182 1979 * May 25 - American Airlines Flight 191 * November 28 - Air New Zealand Flight 901 1983 * September 1 - Korean Air Flight 7 1985 * June 23 - Air India Flight 182 * August 2 - Delta Air Lines Flight 191 1988 * March 17 - Avianca Flight 410 * July 3 - Iran Air Flight 655 (shot down) * August 31 - Delta Air Lines Flight 1411 * December 28 - Pan Am Flight 103 (Lockerbie air disaster) 1989 * January 8 - British Midlands Flight 92 (Kegworth air disaster) * September 19 - UTA Flight 772 1994 * December 11 - Philippine Airlines Flight 434 * December 24 - Air France Flight 8969 1996 * May 11 - Valujet Flight 592 * July 17 - TWA Flight 800 (exploded over Atlantic Ocean - electrical problems, shot down?) * October 6 - AeroPeru Flight 603 * November 23 - Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 1998 * September 2 - Swissair Flight 111 1999 * June 1 - American Airlines Flight 1420 * July 24 - All Nippon Airways Flight 61 * August 22 - Mandarin Airlines Flight 642 * October 31 - EgyptAir Flight 990 * December 24-December 31 - Indian Airlines Flight 814 2000 * January 30 - Alaska Airlines Flight 261 * July 25 - Air France Flight 4590 * October 31 - Singapore Airlines Flight 6 2001 * September 11 - American Airlines Flight 11 N344AA (hit WTC 1) * September 11 - United Airlines Flight 175 N612UA (hit WTC 2 - this is doubted by Rosalee Grable; refer to Ghostplane, Ghostplane II, and Missileout) * September 11 - American Airlines Flight 77 N644AA (probably shot down over Colorado, did not hit the Pentagon) Was it hijacked at all? * September 11 - United Airlines Flight 93 N591UA (shot down) Was it hijacked at all? Was it trying to land? * October 8 - Linate Airport disaster, Scandinavian Airlines Flight 686 * November 12 - American Airlines Flight 587 N14053 (terrorism?) * December 22 - American Airlines Flight 63 2002 * May 25 - China Airlines Flight 611 * November 6 - Luxair Flight 9642 2003 * December 25 (Christmas) - UTA Flight 141 2004 * January 3 - Flash Airlines Flight 8604 (possible hijacking)

Posted at 08:21 am by hummerh3
Comments (1)

Thoughts on 9/11 - under construction

For your consideration:
88 Websites With Evidence Of U.S. Government Complicity In 9-11


A few thoughts on 9/11 from a 9/11 "researcher" who's been seeking the truth for a year:
1. American Airlines Flight 77 N644AA was shot down over Colorado on 9/11/2001. Reports of a jumbo jet being shot down over Colorado on 9/11 were whitewashed by the controlled media. It was not piloted by the incompetent Hani Hanjour into the Pentagon. Search around on the internet and hear some quotes from flight instructors such as Sheri Baxter. Hani Hanjour couldn't control and land a single-engine Cessna 172; he was a sucky pilot! American Airlines Captain Charles Frank 'Chic' Burlingame III, a graduate of U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis who landed F-4 Phantom jets on aircraft carriers in the Navy, would not have allowed 5-foot tall Hani Hanjour to take over the cockpit with boxcutters and plastic knives. Flight 77 served as the patsy plane for the Pentagon attack (which was carried out with bombs, a missile, or a smaller jet, or a mix of these things). High level officials knew in advance of the fake attack, which was planned just in case the WTC operation would fail (all part of their plan to justify war against Afganistan and Iraq), and thus stayed out of the heavily fortified area that was five days from being completely renovated. No high-level officials were killed or injured inside the building! The CIA faked a jumbo jet attack on the Pentagon (John Fulton and the CIA planned to simulate a plane crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01). High level officials were warned on September 10 not to fly commercial on September 11.
* The unusual passengers on Flight 77.
* Conflicting eyewitnesses.
* There is a vapor-like trail like that of a missile behind small object in security video. Boeing 757s have turbofans, which are propelled mostly by fans, not nozzle exhaust. Turbofans do not emit vapor trails at low altitudes. The only airborne source of such dense vapor trails is a rocket engine (rocket engines produce water vapor in concentrations causing it to condense immediately). Missiles have rocket engines.
* It took 6 months to release the Pentagon security video and we don't know who released it. Other Pentagon cameras would surely have captured the attack.
* The huge fiery explosion in the video didn't scorch the lawn (which was free of skid marks from the two engines and fuselage, as well). * The progression of the fireball in the video seems very unnatural for a jet fuel explosion. The explosion rapidly grew in a nearly spherical shape and was 130 feet high while still white-hot! Jet fuel fireballs are never white, go from yellow to orange to black, expand slowly compared to explosives, and have shaped determined by momentum, and are therefore not spherical. This is clearly seen in the videos of the WTC impacts. The white explosion seems to be caused by an explosive (depleted uranium?) as opposed to jet fuel. Could the people at the Pentagon have been covering the lawn with gravel and sand to soak up the residue?
* The wrong date and time on the security frames and no frame for 17:37:20 (The time on 'impact' is the same time as the one on 'plane')
* The "impact" photo is much brighter and sharper than the other lower-resolution images.
* The FBI confiscated Nexcom gas station's security video within minutes of the explosion and have not released it (the video should conclusively prove whether or not a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon).
* The cable spools were not knocked down or pulverized, but would have been in the way of the Boeing 757's right engines. A fence extending to edge of construction yard and a generator at corner of construction yard, also directly under right engine's path, are undamaged. A Boeing 757 flying at 400 MPH at such a shallow approach angle could not maneuver around these objects.
* No plane or building debris shot back out over the lawn like debris shot back from when Flight 175 hit the WTC 2, despite the fact that it couldn't have hit the ground or cable spools
* Did the Pentagon pave the lawn with gravel so soon after the crash so heavy equipment can clear rubble, or were they really trying to quickly cover up the undamaged lawn?
* The debris in Mark Faram photo is less than an inch thick (maybe, 1/16th of an inch?!) and the "n" is 2.5 times smaller than the n in "American" on American Airlines Boeing 757s. The hull of a 757, a pressurized cabin, is much thicker than 1/16th of an inch. This debris, which matches the forward part of the fuselage, had no burn or scrape marks despite the fact that the "Boeing 757" is said to have slammed into the 24-inch thick reinforced, concrete walls at 350 to 600+ mph, and the fuselage was supposedly destroyed. The piece is on the left side of the flight path, but matches the right side of the aircraft. Hmm... It would be hard not to come to the cocnlusion that this debris was planted.
* If this photo shows plane debris next to the control tower, how did it get there when the control tower would be blocking the blast path of the "Boeing?"
* We have no way of knowing whether the landing gear photographs (from inside the building)
are authentic as the source of these photos is unknown, and it is possible that the military planted these plane parts inside the Pentagon before the explosion or the photos are from another crash (if they even are Boeing 757 landing gear or plane debris at all).
* A square hole in the wall is supposed to be made by the round fuselage of a Boeing 757.
* Officials say that Flight 77 hit between the 1st and 2nd stories, so why was the 2nd story floor still intact on 9/11?
* The fragile nose of Flight 77 was said to have penetrated all the way through 3 concrete/steel hardened rings (the Pentagon has a 24-inch thick outer wall, I believe) and punched out a round hole through the inside wall of Ring "C" in the shape of itself. If this is true, then what happened to its nose after that, why is there no evidence of the nosecone outside the punch-out hole? These are some photographs of jumbo jets (1, 2, 3, 4) whose noses were crushed when they crashed into dirt and grass. Even if the reinforced masonry of the Pentagon was blast-resistant, it was much weaker than the Twin Tower's steel walls because the Twin Towers were designed to resist 140 MPH wind.
* Dulles air traffic controllers thought the aircraft was a military plane. 9/11 Review link. *The aircraft, coming from the north, crashed into the west block of the Pentagon by executing an 270? spiral and descending 7,000 feet in 2.5 minutes. Hani Hanjour could not have executed this and then level out to treetop level, then fly a 44-foot tall plane into a 71-foot tall building at 350 to 600 mph without touching the ground!
* The maximum height of the damage is 26 feet, and yet it is supposed to have been hit by a plane 44 feet tall. If a Boeing 757-200 hit the Pentagon at a 45 degree angle and its engines were resting on the ground, then the minimal height of the damage would be 40 feet. The plane did not hit the ground, as many believers of the official story say, because there are no skid or burn marks on the lawn.
* The maximum width of the damage at ground level is around 90 feet. The plane has a wingspan of about 155 feet. The wings did not hit the ground. There was no large wing debris on the ground from a jumbo jet. If a Boeing 757-200 hit the Pentagon at a 45º angle, then the width of the damage would be at least 177 feet.
* A Boeing 757-200 weighs over 80 tons when empty, and its engine pods, which extend 5 feet below the fuselage, are 10 feet in diameter. Hani Hanjour could not have maneuvered the plane so that it would fly inches above the lawn and leave no skid marks.
* No windows above the second floor were broken.
* There is no impression of a Boeing 757's tail or wingtips, or any plane's tail or wingtips, for that matter.
* The regions of the hole that would have been obliterated by the densest part of aircraft have standing columns.
* No photos show seats, bodies, luggage, or large aircraft parts.
* Two small pieces ( "green metal") are described as "...believed to be a piece of the aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon." The military website uses vague, legalistic language ('believed to be, the aircraft that crashed') so that they won't implicate themselves in the cover-up. They are giving themselves plausible deniability by claiming not to know that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
* The few small pieces of aircraft debris outside of the Pentagon's west block were rapidly removed, but not by crime scene investigators. In the video "Painful Deceptions," a line of about 20 men in uniform combing the lawn in front of the impact zone. Photos show men in dress suits removing aircraft scraps. This photograph shows a group of uniformed military men carrying away a large tarped box, which clearly was not the least bit heavy. 
* All of the aircraft remains were destroyed as part of the cover-up. No one has been punished for this unprecendented, criminal lapse of Standard Operation Procedures!
* Why hasn't the FBI released the black boxes? Will they release a staged recording someday?
* Naval Officer Bernard Brown Sr. had a conversation with his son about not being afraid of dying just before he put him on AA Flight 77, the plane that was shot down over Colorado (it certainly did NOT hit the Pentagon). Had Bernard Brown been at work that day he would have been killed as the aircraft crashed into his office at the Pentagon. Luckily he had taken a rare day off to play golf. http://home.earthlink.net/~killtown/index.html The above site also "debunks the debunking sites." (i.e., Snopes, TruthorFiction, Paul Boutin) 2. United Airlines Flight 93 N591UA, a Boeing 757-222, was shot down over Somerset County, Pennsylvania on 9/11/01 by an unmarked, white military jet (an F-16?) before it crashed at 10:06:05 A.M. on 9/11/01. The government is not going to admit it shot down Flight 93 because doing so would raise questions about why the other planes weren't intercepted. The U.S. airline industry has only survived to this day because the government has conveyed an illusion of security with their heavy-handed security measures. http://911timeline.net 3. fundamentalist Egyptian Mohamed Atta: * Atta was born on September 1, 1968. * He studied architecture in Hamburg, Germany, where he was last seen. In 1999, he reported to German authorities that his passport had been stolen. German authorities have said this was to cover-up stamps showing trips to Afghanistan which might stop them getting into the US. * Atta disliked Osama Bin Laden for the mid-1990's bombing of the Egyptian embassy in Pakistan. He has referred to bin Laden as a "sinner." * He was thoroughly disapproving of women behaving even slightly impurely. As a teenager he would not watch belly dancing and would frown at his landlady if she walked in wearing a sleeveless top. He was very uncomfortable around women. He therefore wouldn't have gambled or partied and swigged rum and vodka at topless bars.
* His sister used to give him medicine to stop him from getting sick on plane trips. He didn't fly Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center because he was afraid of flying.
* The Egyptian Atta is only 5'7" and would probably be incapable of taking over the cockpit (at least without guns). John Ogonowski was captain of American Airlines Flight 11. Ogonowski was an Air Force fighter pilot in Vietnam and joined American Airlines 23 years ago. He was big, burly and physically strong. His co-pilot, Tom McGuinness, was also in excellent physical condition. Atta couldn't have managed to kill these men with boxcutters and plastic knives. * Stories about Atta's enquiries about crop-duster planes have turned out to be fiction. The dates were all wrong. * Atta called his father Mohamed el-Amir, a Cairo Lawyer, on September 12, 2001. MSNBC link.
* Real Atta may have never visited the U.S. non-fundamentalist imposter Mohamed Atta:
* He was an extremely skilled pilot who learned to fly military jets in a Middle Eastern air force and continued his training at International Officer's School in Montgomery, Alabama, and received U.S. military training, intended for members of foreign military services, in how to use E-2 Hawkeye radar aircraft at Norfolk Naval Air Station in Virginia.
* The impostor Mohamed Atta obtained the identity of the Egyptian Mohamed Atta in 1999. * The impostor Mohamed Atta wrote a will referring to the real Atta, but the will does not appear to be genuine because the impostor is not well versed in Islam. * He made a spectacle of himself by getting drunk at topless bars. He visited prostitutes. * Rudi Dekkers--president of the flight school in which Atta and Al-Shehhi trained-- attempted to speak to the impostor Atta in German (a language in which the real Atta was very fluent). Atta gave him a blank look and walked away.
* The impostor Atta, or his fellow hijackers, took control of the cockpit with guns and explosives. *The impostor Atta had a Saudi passport. * When Atta stayed in Las Vegas his hotel was round the corner from the FBI office. This is similar to the behavior of Waleed Alshehri, who stayed three blocks away from the CIA headquarters in Vienna. Various stories in the press have completely confused the issue by mixing up people with the same or similar names (the Mahmoud Mahmoud Atta who blew up a bus in Jerusalem in 1986, the Dr. Mohamed Atta who visited New York City in September 2001 and who has nothing to do with terrorism, etc...) 4. The non-fundamentalist Lebanese Ziad Samir Jarrah (from a secular, middle-class family) whose photograph is on the FBI "Penttbom" site is not the man who hijacked Flight 93. He was impersonated by a man whose face is on the passport photo that was possibly planted at the Flight 93 disaster site. "The Two Ziad Jarrahs." Also, read this Sun Sentinel article. 5. One of the photos of Ahmed Ibrahim Alhaznawi is an impersonator , and the same may be true of the photos of Khalid Alhmihdar and Majed Moqed. Eight or more of the men whose names are on the FBI's 19 hijacker list are alive today. The actual hijackers did not need to train at two-bit flying schools because they already had the experience necessary to hit the World Trade Center buildings with extreme precision (the North Tower, at least). One of the hijackers booked their ticket in the University of Oklahoma library. He consulted with the librarian who advised him that the person who booked the ticket was a white American male! 6. Either WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed in a controlled demolition, or they were built poorly by corrupt Mafia contractors and checked by corrupt inspectors 6B. An Army School of Advanced Military Studies issued a report written by elite U.S. army officers, which is made public just prior to 9/11. The report gives the following description for the Israeli spy agency known as the Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." After 9/11 and revelations of a large Mossad spy ring operating mysteriously in the U.S. and the 5 Israelis cheering on the WTC attacks from rooftops, some suggest that the Mossad did in fact do just that on 9/11.
*In late September six Israelis were stopped in Kansas with valid passports and maps of US nuclear power installations. Ashcroft was reported furious they were not held for questioning. Jerusalem Post link. They were never found. They presumably escaped to Canada. * One month after 9/11 two Israelis in Mexico illegally were arrested in the Mexican Congressional building. They were carrying ten sticks of dynamite, nine grenades and two guns. They were arrested and deported. * In the following months over 120 Israelis illegally in the US were arrested and deported. They were spying on military and law enforcement facilities and personnel. Their training was in espionage and demolition.
* In May 2002, two Israelis illegally in the US were arrested in Washington State across for a military base driving an empty rental truck. There were traces of explosives in the truck. Shortly afterwards the US released a warning of explosives in apartment buildings and deported the Israelis. * Is there is only one Israeli citizen on the 9/11 victim list? I haven't verified this yet.
*
Israel has spied on the US since it came into existence and Zionists spied before Israel was created by the UN. Jonathan Pollard's spying is one of the most damaging in US history. * There were dozens of reports of Israeli spies prior to 9/11 which were ignored. http://www.911timeline.net A must-read: http://oldmanjoe.tripod.com/9-11_probabilities.htm 7. Zacarias Moussaoui is a terrorist, but is not connected to the 9/11 plot. There is no real case against him. The story that he didn't want to learn to take off or land is a lie. 8. Flight 11 may have been hijacked with handguns and knives, not just boxcutters. The hijackers, who may have been gun and drug smugglers, almost certainly used guns and explosives on the planes. A rule that allowed pilots to carry guns in the cockpit was rescinded 2 months before 9/11 (however, it had been in place since 1961) in spite of the fact that warnings were given about potential hijackings in the same month. Did Daniel C. Lewin try to be a hero and stop the hijackers before he was shot? Did Daniel Lewin know who the hijackers were and therefore board the plane to attempt to abort the hijacking? (Please read about the 5 Israeli spies cheering the WTC attacks from rooftops) The planes were not electronically hijacked. To say that the planes were remotely controlled is ignoring the fact that people are prepared to kill themselves for a cause. Although, it is weird that an X-files spin-off, "The Lone Gunmen," aired in March 2001, and the plot involves government operatives crashing of a plane into the World Trade Center using remote control technology. The plan was to blame terrorists in order to keep tensions high and increase arms sales. * The FBI has admitted it has absolutely no evidence implicating bin Laden or Al Qaeda. * None of the real names of the hijackers appear on any of the passenger lists (Wikipedia says that the CNN list is only partial, and Wikipedia has what it claims to be the full manifests). None of the forged names from the required picture IDs appears on the passenger lists from CNN. Is Mark Elsis correct in stating that no hijackers were on the official manifests and 36 or 37 passengers' names were missing? UPDATE: A must-read forum on the passenger lists. * None of the released passenger lists adds up to the number of passengers claimed to have been on the planes. 9. The intent of the perpetrators may have been to minimize the number of fatalities while creating a huge shock. *Shouldn't the terrorists have flown jumbo jets into the two stations at Indian Point nuclear power plant that contain a combined 65+ years worth of highly radioactive waste? Indian Point is just 24 miles north of the New York City border. A successful hit could perhaps have caused upwards of 20 million deaths due to radiation poisoning and would have turned an inordinate number of acres of beautiful forest into a barren wasteland. * The Pantex Nuclear Weapons complex has stockpiled more than 30 tons of deadly plutonium--50% of all the plutonium that is stored in the United States. The plutonium is stored in bunkers above ground that were designed in the 1940's, 1950's, and 1960's. These bunkers are very vulnerable to an attack by a large airliner or airliners that are full of fuel. The Pantex Nuclear Weapons complex is only five miles from the Amarillo International Airport. *Why didn't the terrorists strike between the 25th and 45th floor of each tower at midday, when the buildings held up to 50,000 people? * The terrorists would have crashed a plane into the other side of the building if they were intending to kill such high-level officials as Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld. Instead, something other than a jumbo jet hit the least occupied section of the building, which was five days from being completely renovated, and 125 people on the ground were killed. More than 25,000 people work at the Pentagon. 10. Over ten countries gave general to specific warnings of the possibility of hijacked planes crashing into U.S. symbols of military and economic power on or about 9/11/01: *Israel (the Mossad had been surveilling the alleged hijackers) *Great Britain (the MI6 warned the U.S. of al-Qaeda attacks) *Egypt (President Hosni Mubarak said he warned the U.S. that "something would happen" 12 days before 9/11) *France *Russia *Morocco (Moroccan secret service agent Hassan Dabou was not sure what the target was to be, only that it would be a "large-scale operation in New York in the summer or autumn of 2001". He mentioned meetings at which Osama bin Laden vented his fury at al-Qaeda's failure to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993 and proclaimed his desire for revenge. ) *Jordan Leaders of Argentina's Jewish community received a warning about an impending major terrorist attack against the United States, Argentina, or France just weeks before September 11. * Germany * the Phillipines * Also, an Iranian man known only as Ali S. in a German jail awaiting deportation repeatedly phoned U.S. law enforcement to warn of an imminent attack on the World Trade Center in the week of September 9-15. He called it "an attack that will change the world." After a month of badgering his prison guards, he was finally able to call the White House 14 times in the days before the attack and then tried to send a fax to Bush, but was denied permission hours before the 9/11 attacks. German police later confirmed the calls. 11. Iraq is not connected to 9/11. The current massacre of innocent Iraqi civilians does not have anything to do with the fraudulent "war on terror." 12. Osama bin Laden did not plot the 9/11 terrorism. The confession video released by the Pentagon on 12/13/01 did not show the real Osama Bin Laden. (Just a few of the differences between the real Osama bin Laden and the actor: * Osama has a much taller and narrower nose. * Osama has a less rounded brow ridge. * Osama is less well nourished.
* Osama has lower and less full cheeks.
* Osama's forehead slopes back more.
* Osama's face is wider at the level of his eyes.)
This is not to say that bin Laden is innocent of all crimes of which he is accused. Did Al Qaeda play a role in the attacks at all? Were the attacks carried out by Arabs working for the ISI and CIA? Was it a Mossad false-flag operation designed to frame Israel's enemies so that the U.S. would eliminate them?
13. NORAD deliberately stood down on 9/11/01. "Al Qaeda" is not capable of standing down the U.S. air defense system. For more on Al Qaeda and the war on terror (9/11, Bush, the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged hijackers, and much more), please see the exemplary website: http://xymphora.blogspot.com. The terrorists risked interception by fighter jets. Why didn't they play it safe and board planes from JFK, Newark, or other airports close to the city? They knew that they would not be intercepted and that someone with high authority would stand down the Air Defense System for them. A great site about the NORAD stand-down. [NORAD should be called IGNORAD or SNORAD if such a criminal collapse of SOP occurs again.]  14. The Bush family was complicit with the 9/11 attacks. They, at the very least, had foreknowledge of the attacks and stood to gain very much from them. http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/bush.html 15. The anthrax attacks were designed to divert attention from unanswered questions regarding September 11th during the patriotic pandemonium we saw in the wake of the tragedy. Also, the targets of the anthrax attacks were Democrats (like Daschle) who opposed the passage of the Patriot Act. http://cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/AAanthrax.html

Posted at 08:20 am by hummerh3


Thoughts on 9/11 002 - under construction

16. The CIA recruited, trained, and financially supported the 9/11 hijackers, some of whom were mercenaries. A part of the CIA operating in Saudi Arabia made sure that the hijackers, who may or may not have been Saudis, obtained visas so that that could train in the U.S. for the 9/11 attacks. *The terrorists, several of whom were on watch lists, easily obtained visas and had no problems with the immigration system. *Atta was able to stay in the U.S. even though his visa had expired, and he abandoned a plane at Miami airport without repercussions. In addition, he failed to show up for court for a speeding ticket (many of the mercenaries made a spectacle of themselves at topless bars and showed no concern that their operation would be thwarted when they were ticketed for speeding and their names were run through computers). *Several terrorists allegedly trained at Pensacola Naval Station and other U.S. military installations. *There is also the sheer speed with which the hijackers' names and faces were identified. *The CIA is connected to some of the Florida flight schools at which the hijackers allegedly trained. The CIA allowed the alcohol smuggling scam in Saudi Arabia to continue because they owed it to them for issuing visas to the terrorists. They must have known about the purchase of 4,744 put options vs. 396 call options on United Airlines between 9/6/01 and 9/7/01, as well as the purchase of 4,516 vs. 748 call options on American Airlines. The firm on UAL stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, Executive director of the CIA. It has been documented that the CIA, the Mossad and many other intelligence agencies monitor stock trading in real time using highly advanced programs such as Promis. Both the FBI and the Justice Department have confirmed the use of such programs for US intelligence gathering through at least this summer. This would confirm that CIA should have had additional advance warning of imminent attacks against American and United Airlines planes. The following is excerpted from an article at http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_2022000/2022452.stm: Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar were two terrorist suspects known by the CIA to have entered the US prior to Spet 11th. They opened bank accounts and got flying lessons in their own names. How much money does the CIA cost every year? Newsweek also says that the CIA did not pass on the intelligence to the Immigration and Naturalisation Service, which could have stopped them entering the US. Instead, the two men lived openly in the US and used their real names to open bank accounts and take flying lessons. The report says that the State Department even renewed Mihdhar's visa in July 2001 despite the CIA's having linked him to one of the men believed to be behind the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000. The magazine says the CIA had files on the two men at its Counterterrorism Centre for a year and nine months. It was only three weeks before the 11 September attacks, when CIA Director George Tenet ordered an urgent review of the files after receiving repeated signals of an imminent terrorist attack. I am fairly convinced that the above statements are true as of now, but I am not claiming that these statements are 100% accurate. The author is only seeking the truth and does not mean any disrespect to those affected by this tragedy (a relative of mine was on Flight 93, and a firefighter from the neighborhood died saving lives in the WTC). That's all for today. I'll try to post more thoughts later.

Posted at 08:19 am by hummerh3