For your consideration:
88 Websites With Evidence Of U.S. Government Complicity In 9-11
A few thoughts on 9/11 from a 9/11 "researcher" who's been seeking the truth for a year:
1. American Airlines Flight 77 N644AA was shot down over Colorado on 9/11/2001. Reports of a jumbo jet being shot down over Colorado on 9/11 were whitewashed by the controlled media. It was not piloted by the incompetent Hani Hanjour into the Pentagon. Search around on the internet and hear some quotes from flight instructors such as Sheri Baxter.
Hani Hanjour couldn't control and land a single-engine Cessna 172; he was a sucky pilot! American Airlines Captain Charles Frank 'Chic' Burlingame III, a graduate of U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis who landed F-4 Phantom jets on aircraft carriers in the Navy, would not have allowed
5-foot tall Hani Hanjour to take over the cockpit with boxcutters and plastic knives. Flight 77 served as the patsy plane for the Pentagon attack (which was carried out with bombs, a missile, or a smaller jet, or a mix of these things). High level officials knew in advance of the fake attack, which was planned just in case the WTC operation would fail (all part of their plan to justify war against Afganistan and Iraq), and thus stayed out of the heavily fortified area that was five days from being completely renovated. No high-level officials were killed or injured inside the building! The CIA faked a jumbo jet attack on the Pentagon (John Fulton and the CIA
planned to simulate a plane crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01). High level officials were warned on September 10 not to fly commercial on September 11.
*
The unusual passengers on Flight 77.
* Conflicting eyewitnesses.
* There is a vapor-like trail like that of a missile behind small object in security video. Boeing 757s have turbofans, which are propelled mostly by fans, not nozzle exhaust. Turbofans do not emit vapor trails at low altitudes. The only airborne source of such dense vapor trails is a rocket engine (rocket engines produce water vapor in concentrations causing it to condense immediately). Missiles have rocket engines.
* It took 6 months to release the
Pentagon security video and we don't know who released it. Other Pentagon cameras would surely have captured the attack.
* The huge fiery explosion in the video didn't scorch the lawn (which was free of skid marks from the two engines and fuselage, as well). * The progression of the fireball in the video seems very unnatural for a jet fuel explosion. The explosion rapidly grew in a nearly spherical shape and was 130 feet high while still white-hot! Jet fuel fireballs are never white, go from yellow to orange to black, expand slowly compared to explosives, and have shaped determined by momentum, and are therefore not spherical. This is clearly seen in the videos of the WTC impacts. The white explosion seems to be caused by an explosive (depleted uranium?) as opposed to jet fuel. Could the people at the Pentagon have been covering the lawn with gravel and sand to soak up the residue?
* The wrong date and time on the security frames and no frame for 17:37:20 (The time on 'impact' is the same time as the one on 'plane')
* The "impact" photo is much brighter and sharper than the other lower-resolution images.
*
The FBI confiscated Nexcom gas station's security video within minutes of the explosion and have not released it (the video should conclusively prove whether or not a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon).
* The
cable spools were not knocked down or pulverized, but would have been in the way of the Boeing 757's right engines. A fence extending to edge of construction yard and a generator at corner of construction yard, also directly under right engine's path, are undamaged. A Boeing 757 flying at 400 MPH at such a shallow approach angle could not maneuver around these objects.
* No plane or building debris shot back out over the lawn like debris shot back from when Flight 175 hit the WTC 2, despite the fact that it couldn't have hit the ground or cable spools
* Did the Pentagon pave the lawn with gravel so soon after the crash so heavy equipment can clear rubble, or were they really trying to quickly cover up the
undamaged lawn?
* The debris in Mark Faram photo is less than an inch thick (maybe, 1/16th of an inch?!) and
the "n" is 2.5 times smaller than the n in "American" on American Airlines Boeing 757s. The hull of a 757, a pressurized cabin, is much thicker than 1/16th of an inch. This debris, which matches the forward part of the fuselage, had no burn or scrape marks despite the fact that the "Boeing 757" is said to have slammed into the 24-inch thick reinforced, concrete walls at
350 to
600+ mph, and the fuselage was supposedly destroyed. The piece is on the left side of the flight path, but matches the right side of the aircraft. Hmm... It would be hard not to come to the cocnlusion that this debris was planted.
* If
this photo shows plane debris next to the control tower, how did it get there when the control tower would be blocking the blast path of the "Boeing?"
* We have no way of knowing whether the
landing gear photographs (from inside the building)
are authentic as the source of these photos is unknown, and it is possible that the military planted these plane parts inside the Pentagon before the explosion or the photos are from another crash (if they even are Boeing 757 landing gear or plane debris at all).
* A square hole in the wall is supposed to be made by the round fuselage of a Boeing 757.
* Officials say that Flight 77 hit between the 1st and 2nd stories, so why was the 2nd story floor still intact on 9/11?
* The fragile nose of Flight 77 was said to have penetrated all the way through 3 concrete/steel hardened rings (the Pentagon has a 24-inch thick outer wall, I believe) and punched out a round hole through the inside wall of Ring "C" in the shape of itself. If this is true, then what happened to its nose after that, why is there no evidence of the nosecone outside the punch-out hole?

These are some photographs of jumbo jets (
1,
2,
3,
4) whose noses were crushed when they crashed into dirt and grass. Even if the reinforced masonry of the Pentagon was blast-resistant, it was much weaker than the Twin Tower's steel walls because the Twin Towers were designed to resist 140 MPH wind.
*
Dulles air traffic controllers thought the aircraft was a military plane. 9/11 Review link. *The aircraft, coming from the north, crashed into the west block of the Pentagon by executing an 270?
spiral and descending 7,000 feet in 2.5 minutes. Hani Hanjour could not have executed this and then level out to treetop level, then fly a 44-foot tall plane into a
71-foot tall building at 350 to 600 mph without touching the ground!
* The maximum height of the damage is 26 feet, and yet it is supposed to have been hit by a plane 44 feet tall. If a Boeing 757-200 hit the Pentagon at a 45 degree angle and its engines were resting on the ground, then the minimal height of the damage would be 40 feet. The plane did not hit the ground, as many believers of the official story say, because there are no skid or burn marks on the lawn.
* The maximum width of the damage at ground level is around 90 feet. The plane has a wingspan of about 155 feet. The wings did not hit the ground. There was no large wing debris on the ground from a jumbo jet. If a Boeing 757-200 hit the Pentagon at a 45º angle, then the width of the damage would be at least 177 feet.
* A Boeing 757-200 weighs over 80 tons when empty, and its engine pods, which extend 5 feet below the fuselage, are 10 feet in diameter. Hani Hanjour could not have maneuvered the plane so that it would fly inches above the lawn and leave no skid marks.
* No windows above the second floor were broken.
* There is no impression of a Boeing 757's tail or wingtips, or any plane's tail or wingtips, for that matter.
* The regions of the hole that would have been obliterated by the densest part of aircraft have standing columns.
* No photos show seats, bodies, luggage, or large aircraft parts.
* Two small pieces ( "green metal") are described as "...believed to be a piece of the aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon." The
military website uses vague, legalistic language ('believed to be, the aircraft that crashed') so that they won't implicate themselves in the cover-up. They are giving themselves plausible deniability by claiming not to know that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
* The few small pieces of aircraft debris outside of the Pentagon's west block were rapidly removed, but not by crime scene investigators. In the video "Painful Deceptions," a line of about 20 men in uniform combing the lawn in front of the impact zone. Photos show men in dress suits removing aircraft scraps. This photograph shows a group of uniformed military men carrying away a large tarped box, which clearly was not the least bit heavy.
* All of the aircraft remains were destroyed as part of the cover-up. No one has been punished for this unprecendented, criminal lapse of Standard Operation Procedures!
* Why hasn't the FBI released the black boxes? Will they release a staged recording someday?
* Naval Officer Bernard Brown Sr. had a
conversation with his son about not being afraid of dying just before he put him on AA Flight 77, the plane that was shot down over Colorado (it certainly did NOT hit the Pentagon). Had Bernard Brown been at work that day he would have been killed as the aircraft crashed into his office at the Pentagon. Luckily he had taken a rare day off to play golf.
http://home.earthlink.net/~killtown/index.html The above site also "debunks the debunking sites." (i.e.,
Snopes,
TruthorFiction,
Paul Boutin) 2. United Airlines Flight 93 N591UA, a Boeing 757-222, was shot down over Somerset County, Pennsylvania on 9/11/01 by an unmarked, white military jet (an F-16?) before it crashed at
10:06:05 A.M. on 9/11/01. The government is not going to admit it shot down Flight 93 because doing so would raise questions about why the other planes weren't intercepted. The U.S. airline industry has only survived to this day because the government has conveyed an illusion of security with their heavy-handed security measures. http://911timeline.net 3. fundamentalist Egyptian Mohamed Atta: * Atta was born on
September 1, 1968. * He studied architecture in Hamburg, Germany, where he was last seen. In 1999, he reported to German authorities that his passport had been stolen. German authorities have said this was to cover-up stamps showing trips to Afghanistan which might stop them getting into the US. * Atta disliked Osama Bin Laden for the mid-1990's bombing of the Egyptian embassy in Pakistan. He has referred to bin Laden as a "sinner." *
He was thoroughly disapproving of women behaving even slightly impurely. As a teenager he would not watch belly dancing and would frown at his landlady if she walked in wearing a sleeveless top. He was very uncomfortable around women. He therefore wouldn't have gambled or partied and swigged rum and vodka at topless bars.
*
His sister used to give him medicine to stop him from getting sick on plane trips. He didn't fly Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center because he was afraid of flying.
* The Egyptian Atta is only
5'7" and would probably be incapable of taking over the cockpit (at least without guns). John Ogonowski was captain of American Airlines Flight 11. Ogonowski was an Air Force fighter pilot in Vietnam and joined American Airlines 23 years ago. He was big, burly and physically strong. His co-pilot, Tom McGuinness, was also in excellent physical condition. Atta couldn't have managed to kill these men with boxcutters and plastic knives. * Stories about Atta's enquiries about crop-duster planes have turned out to be
fiction. The dates were all wrong. * Atta called his father Mohamed el-Amir, a Cairo Lawyer, on
September 12, 2001.
MSNBC link.
* Real Atta may have never visited the U.S. non-fundamentalist imposter Mohamed Atta:
* He was an extremely skilled pilot who learned to fly military jets in a Middle Eastern air force and continued his training at International Officer's School in Montgomery, Alabama, and
received U.S. military training, intended for members of foreign military services, in how to use E-2 Hawkeye radar aircraft at Norfolk Naval Air Station in Virginia.
* The impostor Mohamed Atta obtained the identity of the Egyptian Mohamed Atta in 1999. * The impostor Mohamed Atta wrote a
will referring to the real Atta, but the will does not appear to be genuine because the impostor is not well versed in Islam. * He made a spectacle of himself by getting drunk at topless bars. He visited prostitutes. * Rudi Dekkers--president of the flight school in which Atta and Al-Shehhi trained-- attempted to speak to the impostor Atta in German (a language in which the real Atta was very fluent). Atta gave him a blank look and walked away.
* The impostor Atta, or his fellow hijackers, took control of the cockpit with guns and explosives. *The impostor Atta had a Saudi passport. * When Atta stayed in Las Vegas his hotel was round the corner from the FBI office. This is similar to the behavior of Waleed Alshehri, who stayed three blocks away from the CIA headquarters in Vienna. Various stories in the press have completely confused the issue by mixing up people with the same or similar names (the
Mahmoud Mahmoud Atta who blew up a bus in Jerusalem in 1986, the
Dr. Mohamed Atta who visited New York City in September 2001 and who has nothing to do with terrorism, etc...) 4. The non-fundamentalist Lebanese Ziad Samir Jarrah (from a secular, middle-class family) whose photograph is on the FBI "Penttbom" site is not the man who hijacked Flight 93. He was impersonated by a man whose face is on the passport photo that was possibly planted at the Flight 93 disaster site.

"
The Two Ziad Jarrahs." Also, read
this Sun Sentinel article. 5. One of the photos of Ahmed Ibrahim Alhaznawi is an impersonator

, and the same may be true of the photos of Khalid Alhmihdar and Majed Moqed. Eight or more of the men whose names are on the FBI's 19 hijacker list are alive today. The actual hijackers did not need to train at two-bit flying schools because they already had the experience necessary to hit the World Trade Center buildings with extreme precision (the North Tower, at least). One of the hijackers booked their ticket in the University of Oklahoma library. He consulted with the librarian who advised him that the person who booked the ticket was a white American male! 6. Either WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed in a controlled demolition, or they were built poorly by corrupt Mafia contractors and checked by corrupt inspectors 6B. An Army School of Advanced Military Studies issued a report written by elite U.S. army officers, which is made public just prior to 9/11. The report gives the following description for the Israeli spy agency known as the Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." After 9/11 and revelations of a large Mossad spy ring operating mysteriously in the U.S. and the 5 Israelis cheering on the WTC attacks from rooftops, some suggest that the Mossad did in fact do just that on 9/11.
*
In late September six Israelis were stopped in Kansas with valid passports and maps of US nuclear power installations. Ashcroft was reported furious they were not held for questioning. Jerusalem Post link. They were never found. They presumably escaped to Canada. *
One month after 9/11 two Israelis in Mexico illegally were arrested in the Mexican Congressional building. They were carrying ten sticks of dynamite, nine grenades and two guns. They were arrested and deported. * In the following months over 120 Israelis illegally in the US were arrested and deported. They were spying on military and law enforcement facilities and personnel. Their training was in espionage and demolition.
* In May 2002, two Israelis illegally in the US were arrested in Washington State across for a military base driving an empty rental truck. There were traces of explosives in the truck. Shortly afterwards the US released a warning of explosives in apartment buildings and deported the Israelis. * Is there is only one Israeli citizen on the 9/11 victim list? I haven't verified this yet.
*
Israel has spied on the US since it came into existence and Zionists spied before Israel was created by the UN. Jonathan Pollard's spying is one of the most damaging in US history. * There were dozens of reports of Israeli spies prior to 9/11 which were ignored.
http://www.911timeline.net A must-read:
http://oldmanjoe.tripod.com/9-11_probabilities.htm 7. Zacarias Moussaoui is a terrorist, but is not connected to the 9/11 plot. There is no real case against him. The story that he didn't want to learn to take off or land is a lie. 8. Flight 11 may have been hijacked with handguns and knives, not just boxcutters. The hijackers, who may have been gun and drug smugglers, almost certainly used guns and explosives on the planes.
A rule that allowed pilots to carry guns in the cockpit was rescinded 2 months before 9/11 (however, it had been in place since 1961) in spite of the fact that warnings were given about potential hijackings in the same month. Did Daniel C. Lewin try to be a hero and stop the hijackers before he was shot? Did Daniel Lewin know who the hijackers were and therefore board the plane to attempt to abort the hijacking? (Please read about the 5 Israeli spies cheering the WTC attacks from rooftops) The planes were not electronically hijacked. To say that the planes were remotely controlled is ignoring the fact that people are prepared to kill themselves for a cause. Although, it is weird that an X-files spin-off,
"The Lone Gunmen," aired in March 2001, and the plot involves government operatives crashing of a plane into the World Trade Center using remote control technology. The plan was to blame terrorists in order to keep tensions high and increase arms sales. *
The FBI has admitted it has absolutely no evidence implicating bin Laden or Al Qaeda. * None of the real names of the hijackers appear on any of the passenger lists (Wikipedia says that the CNN list is only partial, and Wikipedia has what it claims to be the
full manifests). None of the forged names from the required picture IDs appears on the passenger lists from CNN. Is Mark Elsis correct in stating that no hijackers were on the official manifests and 36 or 37 passengers' names were
missing?
UPDATE: A must-read forum on the passenger lists. * None of the released passenger lists adds up to the number of passengers claimed to have been on the planes. 9. The intent of the perpetrators may have been to minimize the number of fatalities while creating a huge shock. *Shouldn't the terrorists have flown jumbo jets into the two stations at Indian Point nuclear power plant that contain a combined 65+ years worth of highly radioactive waste? Indian Point is just 24 miles north of the New York City border. A successful hit could perhaps have caused upwards of 20 million deaths due to radiation poisoning and would have turned an inordinate number of acres of beautiful forest into a barren wasteland. * The Pantex Nuclear Weapons complex has stockpiled more than 30 tons of deadly plutonium--50% of all the plutonium that is stored in the United States. The plutonium is stored in bunkers above ground that were designed in the 1940's, 1950's, and 1960's. These bunkers are very vulnerable to an attack by a large airliner or airliners that are full of fuel. The Pantex Nuclear Weapons complex is only five miles from the Amarillo International Airport. *Why didn't the terrorists strike between the 25th and 45th floor of each tower at midday, when the buildings held up to 50,000 people? * The terrorists would have crashed a plane into the other side of the building if they were intending to kill such high-level officials as Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld. Instead, something other than a jumbo jet hit the least occupied section of the building, which was five days from being completely renovated, and 125 people on the ground were killed. More than
25,000 people work at the Pentagon. 10. Over ten countries gave general to specific warnings of the possibility of hijacked planes crashing into U.S. symbols of military and economic power on or about 9/11/01: *Israel (the Mossad had been surveilling the alleged hijackers) *Great Britain (the MI6
warned the U.S. of al-Qaeda attacks) *Egypt (President Hosni Mubarak said he warned the U.S. that "something would happen" 12 days before 9/11) *
France *
Russia *Morocco (Moroccan secret service agent Hassan Dabou was not sure what the target was to be, only that it would be a "large-scale operation in New York in the summer or autumn of 2001". He mentioned meetings at which Osama bin Laden vented his fury at al-Qaeda's failure to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993 and proclaimed his desire for revenge. ) *
Jordan Leaders of Argentina's Jewish community received a warning about an impending major terrorist attack against the United States, Argentina, or France just weeks before September 11. *
Germany *
the Phillipines * Also,
an Iranian man known only as Ali S. in a German jail awaiting deportation repeatedly phoned U.S. law enforcement to warn of an imminent attack on the World Trade Center in the week of September 9-15. He called it "an attack that will change the world." After a month of badgering his prison guards, he was finally able to call the White House 14 times in the days before the attack and then tried to send a fax to Bush, but was denied permission hours before the 9/11 attacks. German police later confirmed the calls. 11. Iraq is not connected to 9/11. The current massacre of innocent Iraqi civilians does not have anything to do with the fraudulent "war on terror." 12. Osama bin Laden did not plot the 9/11 terrorism. The confession video released by the Pentagon on 12/13/01 did not show the real Osama Bin Laden. (Just a few of the differences between
the real Osama bin Laden and the actor: * Osama has a much taller and narrower nose. * Osama has a less rounded brow ridge. * Osama is less well nourished.
* Osama has lower and less full cheeks.
* Osama's forehead slopes back more.
* Osama's face is wider at the level of his eyes.)
This is not to say that bin Laden is innocent of all crimes of which he is accused. Did Al Qaeda play a role in the attacks at all? Were the attacks carried out by Arabs working for the ISI and CIA? Was it a Mossad false-flag operation designed to frame Israel's enemies so that the U.S. would eliminate them?
13. NORAD deliberately stood down on 9/11/01. "Al Qaeda" is not capable of standing down the U.S. air defense system. For more on Al Qaeda and the war on terror (9/11, Bush, the case of Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged hijackers, and much more), please see the exemplary website:
http://xymphora.blogspot.com. The terrorists risked interception by fighter jets. Why didn't they play it safe and board planes from JFK, Newark, or other airports close to the city? They knew that they would not be intercepted and that someone with high authority would stand down the Air Defense System for them. A great site about the
NORAD stand-down. [NORAD should be called IGNORAD or SNORAD if such a criminal collapse of SOP occurs again.] 14. The Bush family was
complicit with the 9/11 attacks. They, at the very least, had foreknowledge of the attacks and stood to gain very much from them. http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/bush.html 15. The
anthrax attacks were designed to divert attention from
unanswered questions regarding September 11th during the patriotic pandemonium we saw in the wake of the tragedy. Also, the targets of the anthrax attacks were Democrats (like Daschle) who opposed the passage of the Patriot Act.
http://cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/AAanthrax.html